The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Loper Bright v Raimondo case, which will answer a legal question about the precedent established in the Chevron Doctrine, which grants deference to Federal agencies in determining rules where the underlying law is silent and/or ambiguous. This will be a landmark decision if Chevron is overturned in many different areas where the Courts are required to defer to agencies as they are the experts.
I am hopeful that the questions posed by the Justices will generate a favorable outcome in overturning or restricting application of Chevron when they render their decision in June. There’s a lot of information on the internet about this case, but you can listen to the arguments yourself on the Supreme Court’s website. It’s very interesting to actually hear the arguments and questions being posed by the attorneys and Justices, and it’s only a little over an hour of listening time.
You can listen to it here Loper Bright Arguments
