We’ve updated our TrailSaver to include our new substantive Comments Tool. Help keep our trails open by sharing your personal experience of a ride by answering a few questions after you finish your ride while it’s still fresh in your mind. TrailSaver will transform your answers into substantive comments that can be copied and submitted to BLM or Forest Service when it’s needed. Encourage everyone in your group to use it to submit their own comments

The New TrailSaver Comment Tool is now available to use throughout Utah. If you want to see the Travel Plans we are currently working on  for the San Rafael Swell and San Rafael Desert, Henry Mountain and Fremont Gorge, Trail Canyon, Pausaugaunt, and Dino North Travel Management Areas (TMAs). We will add be adding more TMAs in the near future.

The challenge we’ve always faced with Travel Management is that we’re always playing catch up with only a few days for most comment periods, by the time we get the word out and ask people to go out and write comments, we’re playing catch up and don’t have time to run trails or provide great comments to persuade BLM or Forest Service to Keep them Open.

UPLA revised Trail Saver Version 2.0, a new tool for you to prepare notes after each ride you go on, anywhere in Utah. There’s nothing more effective than putting your thoughts in writing right after your ride when everything is fresh in your mind. If you spend just 5-10 minutes just answering a few questions. Once you submit the form, it will email you a formatted copy of your comments for that trail along with some helpful hints that will make it easy to submit your comments when they are needed. We all think of something else right after we hit submit, Trail Saver allows you to edit or add to your comments, and will immediately send you a revised report.

You don’t have to worry about confusing dates either, once the comment period opens for that Travel Management Plan, Trail Saver will email you a reminder with all of your comments along with more tips and instructions on how to submit them to BLM and or Forest Service. For the system to work effectively, you will need the BLM or Forest Service Route numbers, so I recommend you take a pic of those signs as you go by them and include those when submitting your form. As an alternative, you can enter a common name for the trail or a description of where it is.

TrailSaver reports should be thought of as your notes about what makes keeping the route open important, views, dispersed campsites, challenging or easy, significant vistas, connections to other important routes can all be important. Make an effort to write short notes on every trail you go on, and let Trail Saver keep track of them. When it’s time to submit comments to BLM, TrailSaver will email you your report. Unfortunately, 90% of all comments submitted to BLM are not considered because they don’t meet BLM “substantive comment” standards. TrailSaver helps you make your comments count.

Order and display TrailSaver stickers on your rigs so you can explain the program to others you run into. You can order stickers for yourself, group, or club at www.TrailSaver.com

All comments are valuable, but those that meet the “substantive comment criteria” are better.

Browse This Guide on Crafting Better Comments

UPLA Submitted Scoping Comments for the Dolores River Travel Management Plan. Our original comments were submitted with the original comment closing date and can be seen here.

During the weeklong extension we did a review of routes that were missed in BLM’s inventory and submitted comments on the missing routes.

Supplemental Missing Route Comments

Supplement #1

Supplement #2

We are very early in the process for Travel Management Planning for Dolores River. Please continue to report on Routes in the TMA using TrailSaver.com. TrailSaver will return your reports to you when the next phase of the TMP process is ready to accept comments again.

Resources:

BLM Main Dolores River Eplanning

Public Meeting Announcement

BLM Dolores River Alt A PDF Map

BLM Dolores River Interactive Map

Submit Your Comments before June 21 to the BLM here. Be Patient, you have to wait 10-15 seconds until you see    on the Page, then Click on that. Once you submit your comments, it will take you to a Receipt Page that shows your comments. Click on the Download PDF of your comments and email copies to landuse@utahpla.com AND brc@sharetrails.org

Bears Ears National Monument (BENM) is an exquisitely beautiful and unique 1.36-million-acre gem of public land, located in Southern Utah. BENM is currently going through resource management planning following recent expansion of the monument by presidential proclamation. For more details on the monument expansion, history of BENM, and discussion of resource management planning versus travel management planning for public lands, check out our recent articles on these topics on the Utah Public Lands Alliance (UPLA) website.

The proposed Resource Management Plan (RMP) for BENM was developed via collaboration of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), US Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service (FS), and the Bears Ears Commission (a group representing six Native American tribes). The RMP includes five Alternatives for public comment. All five Alternatives will result in detrimental impact on outdoor recreation access in BENM. Thus, we urge our members and other outdoor recreation enthusiasts to take advantage of the public comment period to advocate for preservation of recreation access. In this article, we’ll compare the varied levels of impact across the five Alternatives. The deadline to submit public comments is June 11, 2024.

The common thread through all five proposed Alternatives in the BENM RMP is: recreation access is viewed as a threat to preservation of natural and cultural resources. Rather than evaluate how recreation can be managed to prevent and mitigate potential impacts on natural and cultural resources, closed or restricted access is the dominant strategy utilized. Unique characteristics of each alternative include:

• ALTERNATIVE A: this is the “no action” alternative by which (most) existing management would continue.
  • BLM lands: eight special recreation management areas (SRMAs) and two extensive recreation management areas (ERMAs) would remain intact.
  • Forest Service lands: management based on Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) categories of primitive, semi-primitive non-motorized, semi-primitive motorized, and roaded natural.
  • Travel management (OHV): existing designated OHV routes would remain open (see table below)
    • 928,080 open to limited OHV access
    • 436,075 acres closed to OHV access
  • Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs): existing ACECs would remain in place, no new ACECs would be created
  • Recreational shooting: permitted
  • Recreational facilities: existing facilities would remain open and intact
• ALTERNATIVE B: provides the most permissive management for recreation access considerations. However, conservation is still heavily prioritized over recreation and public access.
  • BLM lands: would be managed through four SRMAs and four ERMAs
  • Forest Service lands: same as Alternative A
  • Travel Management (OHV):
    • 797,525 acres open to limited OHV access
    • 566,627 acres closed to OHV access
  • Travel Management (aircraft): landings and takeoffs would be limited to Bluff Airport and Fry Canyon Airstrip, with the potential for additional locations to be identified in future implementation level decisions.
  • ACECs: BLM would designate the Indian Creek ACEC, Lavender Mesa ACEC, and Valley of the Gods ACEC. The San Juan River ACEC and Shay Canyon ACEC would not be designated as ACECs.
  • Recreational shooting: permitted generally, with the exception of closures in the Indian Creek Corridor Recreation Management Zone (RMZ), San Juan River SRMA, and prohibitions in campgrounds, developed recreation facilities, climbing areas, existing and designated trails, parking areas, trailheads, across roadways, rock ES-7 writing sites, and structural cultural sites. If problems with recreational shooting occur in the future, the BLM would consider future restrictions or closures.
  • Recreational facilities: may be developed as needed
• ALTERNATIVE C: similar to Alternative B, with additional restrictions to use of drones
  • BLM lands: same as Alt B
  • Forest Service lands: same as Alt A
  • Travel Management (OHV):
    • 700,122 acres open to limited OHV access
    • 664,030 acres closed to OHV access
  • Travel Management (unmanned aircraft / drones): use of drones eliminated throughout most of BENM, with case-by-case exceptions through a permitting process
  • ACECs: same as Alt B
  • Recreational shooting: same as Alt B
  • Recreational facilities: limited development of facilities with emphasis on maintaining natural conditions across the landscape
• ALTERNATIVE D: severe restrictions to recreation access; the primary management priority is for landscape conservation that is achieved through eliminating or heavily restricting recreation
  • BLM lands: managed through creation of seven Management Areas
  • Forest Service lands: same as Alt A
  • Travel Management (OHV):
    • 381,239 acres open to limited OHV access
    • 982,914 acres closed to OHV access
  • Travel Management (aircraft): same as Alt B
  • Travel Management (unmanned aircraft / drones): same as Alt C
  • ACECs: BLM would designate the Indian Creek ACEC, Lavender Mesa ACEC, Valley of the Gods ACEC, John’s Canyon Paleontological ACEC, and Aquifer Protection ACEC. The San Juan River ACEC and Shay Canyon ACEC would not be designated as ACECs.
  • Recreational shooting: same as Alt B
  • Recreational facilities: minimized development of recreational facilities and management in favor of emphasizing natural conditions
• ALTERNATIVE E (the preferred alternative): most recreation access eliminated throughout BENM; maximizes the considerations and use of Tribal perspectives on managing the landscape; emphasis is on resource protection and the use of Traditional Indigenous Knowledge and perspectives on the stewardship of the landscape.
  • BLM & Forest Service lands: SRMAs and ERMAs would be eliminated; recreation managed based on a zoned approach. Four zones would be designated: Front Country, Passage, Outback, and Remote.
  • Travel Management (OHV):
    • 794,181 acres open to limited OHV access
    • 569,971 acres closed to OHV access
  • Travel Management (aircraft): same as Alt B
  • Travel Management (unmanned aircraft / drones): same as Alt C
  • ACECs: all existing ACECs would be carried forward, the John’s Canyon Paleontological ACEC and Aquifer Protection ACEC would also be designated.
  • Recreational shooting: eliminated in full throughout all of BENM
  • Recreational facilities: development allowed only in Front Country and Passage zones, when deemed an absolute necessity

As you can see from the management guidelines proposed by each alternative, there is no alternative that is pro-recreation. A pro-recreation alternative would retain all existing recreation opportunities in the monument as open, including all currently designated motorized routes. It is critical to emphasize that management by closure is not management; rather, this method of “management” serves to banish the public from the opportunity to access and enjoy our public lands. There are many effective strategies to manage public lands, including BENM, by means other than road closures, activity bans, group size limits, and exclusion zones.

We encourage outdoor recreation enthusiasts to submit comments on this RMP to advocate for a pro-recreation alternative that would involve active management techniques such as constructing new infrastructure to sustainably handle increased visitation; this would include new trails, trailheads, parking areas, bathroom facilities, campgrounds, etc. It is possible to manage the natural landscape in a manner that conserves the land, protects wildlife habitat, and retains the rugged, wild characteristics of the landscape, while also creating appropriate places, structure, and guidelines for humans to access, enjoy, and recreate throughout the land.

For more details about the BENM RMP, along with guidance on how to write a high-impact comment to submit for the public comment period, join us for a webinar on May 30 at 6:30pm MT. Utah Public Lands Alliance and BlueRibbon Coalition are partnering to share about how the RMP will affect OHV and outdoor recreation access. Tips and best practices will be presented to help you craft your own substantive comment. Click this link to register for the webinar.

For more details about the Bears Ears National Monument RMP, check out the RMP planning website, the draft RMP, and the BLM’s press release and invitation for public comment:

• Bears Ears National Monument ePlanning website
• Bears Ears National Monument Resource Management Plan
• BLM, USDA Forest Service invite input on Bears Ears National Monument draft plan

UPLA is continuing to review the draft RMP and seek guidance from the outdoor recreation community to identify areas of concern regarding the impacts of each proposed Alternative  If you have questions or would like to share your input on the draft RMP, please contact UPLA’s Natural Resources Consultant, Rose Winn, at rose@uplapla.com.

People often ask what they can say to make their comments effective, or “substantive”. Most
comments do a pretty good job at telling What you want, what’s often missing is the Why which
justifies your comments. There are many justifications that BLM cites for every proposed closure or
restriction to access for each trail, and it is impractical for you to write meaningful comments on all
of them. If everyone running a trail just picks the items most important to you from the list below
and states specific reasons why the trail should remain open.

We really need your input on individual routes, we can’t get it any other way. The more detail you
give the better, but even if you only write about one or two – that will make a tremendous impact in
preventing BLM from making arbitrary decisions to close or restrict OHV access to that trail, and
give us better grounds for legal challenges. Perhaps the most important things for recreationists to
convey about a given route are its value and its manageability.

Click Here to See All Our Suggestions as a PDF

Click Here to See A Sample BLM Route Report for The Barracks Trail