Grand Staircase National Monument Travel Plan Comments Due by Nov. 9

The BLM has released it’s draft plan for the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Southern Utah. BRC engaged its members in 2022 during the scoping period. Comments are accepted until November 9, 2023.

Due to President Biden expanding the boundaries of GSENM, the BLM is in the process of updating the management plan that will include the additional acreage. The 3 additional alternatives proposed are all blatant reductions in access for the public and are unacceptable options. Because BRC and the State of Utah are currently litigating the expansion of the monument, the BLM should not move forward with the planning process. However, until legislation is passed to defund this planning process the public needs to submit comments letting the BLM know that the options are not viable for users and local communities. Please send in a comment below and add your own personal experiences and thoughts into your comment.

Alternative D, is the most restrictive option given. All alternatives will greatly reduce recreation and access across the entire monument. The Little Desert Open OHV will be closed which has a long history of use by the public. Although the majority of specific route closures will be addressed in Travel Management Planning, this plan sets the stage for those closures as you can see in the map below. Wood gathering within the entire monument could be prohibited, target shooting, fires unless in a fire pan would also be prohibited. Group sizes will be limited to 25 people. Routes that provide OHV access, camping access and access for local ranchers could also be closed. In OHV-limited areas, road density would be minimized. There are already so few roads within the monument, the fact the BLM is considering limiting road density even more is egregious. The roads that are already within the monument have difficulty being maintained simply because the BLM will not allow the county to maintain these routes. It is quoted in the plan that OHV use could continue to result in damage to resources. The BLM should first prove the resource damage caused by OHV’s before they claim use will “continue” to cause damage.

This chart shows the current management Plan, Alt A in the first column and Alt D is the most devastating with an area the size of Delaware only having 7 roads.

This chart shows the impact on changes in grazing areas, which will have a direct impact on our food supplies and thus national security.

Many of these routes were created by local ranchers. However, through this planning process grazing will be greatly restricted and reduced. Allotments with no valid permit will be unavailable to grazing along with about half of the monument which is nearly one million acres closed to livestock grazing.

“No new structural range improvements would be permitted unless a current (within the last 10
years) land health assessment and determination are completed for the allotment, unless the improvement would exclude livestock from an area and/or provide protection of GSENM objects. Nonstructural range improvements with a primary purpose of increasing forage for livestock would be prohibited.”

There is also the potential that 559,600 acres will be managed as lands with wilderness characteristics. Multiple new Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) will be designated and historically these designations close or restrict use to all users. Restrictive management is what the BLM and special interest groups are advocating for which will remove all users from this massive monument.

All of these restrictions and proposals pose a massive threat to the local economies. There has already been a decline in the communities since the monument was first designated and these proposals will only exacerbate the issue. The plan states, “Under all alternatives, GSENM would continue to stimulate the local and regional economy through increased jobs, wages, economic output, nonmarket values, and ecosystem services from its uses, such as recreational opportunities and grazing and ranching allotments.” This statement is laughable as all alternatives restrict users and cripple local economies.

You can comment in one of 2 ways, but only until November 9.

1) Submit comments directly on the project planning website
2) Submit comments through the BlueRibbon Coalition Action Alert

Thank you to BlueRibbon Coalition for the summary of this plan




Our Access to Public Lands is Being Attacked Like Never Before

Our freedom to roam is under assault from a plan to close everything off and make us ask permission before we enjoy it.

There is a plan underway to close the great open spaces of the American West to you, me, our children, and our children’s children. The federal government — which owns most of this land — is determined to move from a “use and let use” system of accessing Western public lands to a permission-based system that will mean reservations, permits, and closures.

Just last month, the Bureau of Land Management issued a final decision to close 317 miles of historic and popular off-road trails near Moab, Utah. For decades, these trails — which are mostly old uranium mining roads — have been enjoyed by everyone from Jeep owners to dirt bike riders to base jumpers looking for a place to land. They have evocative names like Gemini Bridges, Mashed Potatoes, and Dead Cow Trail. They appear in guidebooks. Some of them are even featured in the hugely popular Easter Jeep Safari.

The plan is already being implemented, and it threatens the freedom enjoyed by tens of millions of Americans who hike, camp, Jeep, mountain bike, ATV, fish, swim, canoe, kayak, trail run, overland, base jump, raft, and backpack the millions of acres of free space that make “the West” the West.

I have enjoyed our public lands my entire life. There is nothing like a sip of coffee as you watch the first rays of dawn begin to break on the red rocks. You don’t realize how tough your kids are until they shrug off a chilly 15-degree night in a sleeping bag. And you don’t really appreciate how unfathomably vast the West is until you spend three days exploring the backcountry without seeing another human soul.

All of these experiences — and many others — take place on public lands. There is no entrance fee. There is no permit required. You just lace up your hiking boots, or jump in your pickup, or hop on your mountain bike, and you go. Simple as that. So long you don’t litter or destroy or cause a ruckus, you are left to your own devices. It is something that unites Americans of every class, creed, color, and political persuasion.

That feeling of expansive freedom speaks to everyone who steps outside to enjoy and explore America’s public lands. It feels like our birthright to enjoy them and, for hundreds of years now, it has been just that.

But now, that freedom to roam is under assault from a plan to close everything off and make you ask permission before you enjoy it. If nothing is done to stop it, one of the last, great, unifying forces in American public and private life will be fundamentally transformed and left unrecognizable before most people realize what is happening.

Zooming out, the aggressive rate of federal trail closures is part of the larger “30×30” plan that President Joe Biden announced shortly after taking office. The alleged intention is to “conserve at least 30% of U.S. lands and waters and 30% of U.S. ocean areas by 2030.”

There is no evidence that users of these trails have been damaging them. Indeed, people cherish these lands. Go drive the trails and you will rarely encounter even a single piece of trash. That is why they have been in use for decades with no appreciable degradation.

Nevertheless, the federal government is now implementing a plan to close hundreds of miles of cherished trails. And that is why the BlueRibbon Coalition — the nation’s premier group dedicated to preserving motorized access to wilderness — has joined with the Colorado Offroad Trail Defenders to challenge the plan in court. They are represented by my organization, the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

What the Biden administration’s plan really means is an aggressive plan to close those lands to use by the public. Well, not to the entire public — crunchy backpackers and hikers are still beloved by the left. But the executive decision will limit access for the “wrong” kind of outdoorsy people — people who drive Jeeps and Toyotas and ride ATVs and dirt bikes, and who look like they might be having a good time without suffering under a heavy backpack.

This seems to be a great paradox to those who do not understand why people love overlanding, dispersed camping, dirt biking, ATV riding, and off-roading, but it is no mystery to those of us who actually engage in these activities. We love the wilderness, too. We love taking our children, friends, and family out there and enjoying fresh air and magnificent scenery. If we come across someone else’s trash, we pick it up. If we see someone breaking the rules (by, say, driving off-trail), we reprimand them.

There are very, very few law enforcement personnel on these lands enforcing the rules. Instead, the motorized travel community self-enforces an ethic of respect for public lands. We teach it to our children. That is why these trails remain so attractive as a place to recreate.

The Moab closures are a bellwether case for protecting access to public lands. The closures represent a provocative challenge to an entire way of life for millions of people in the West. If the Biden administration can close these lands, it can close them anywhere. Americans have shown themselves to be responsible stewards of their public lands, and they deserve to be able to enjoy them — freely — for generations to come.

By Matt Miller, Texas Public Policy Foundation     November 2, 2023




BLM Open Call for Nominations to BLM Advisory Boards

The BLM is asking for people interested in serving in various citizens advisory committees for the BLM. These are important opportunities to give early opinions about land use policies. Joan Kroc has been serving for almost 4 years and her term will be up in 2025, so we need volunteers to speak up for these positions.

NatCallforNominationsOct2023




Donate Today to Stop the Losses


It is with a heavy heart that we bring you the distressing news from Moab today—a destination cherished by many for its rugged trails and breathtaking landscapes. A staggering 317 miles of roads, including iconic trails like Hey Joe Canyon, Ten Mile Wash, and Hell Roaring Canyon, are facing closure by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM-FOREVER). This alarming trend is not isolated to Moab; it’s spreading across various regions, threatening the very essence of not only off-highway vehicle (OHV) activities, but everyone that uses motorized vehicles to get to the areas they enjoy recreating, including equestrians, rock climbers, backpackers, and virtually everyone that wants to get into the backcountry by vehicles before setting off on to enjoy their next adventure.

The recent decisions related to the BLM Conservation and Landscape Health Rule, Bears Ears and Grand Staircase National Monuments expansion, Middle Gila in Arizona, Rock Springs Resource Management Plan in Wyoming, Nez Perce Clearwater National Forest in Idaho, and Table Mesa in Arizona have further fueled concerns. These decisions are adversely affecting not only the off-road community but also devastating snowmobiling and other OHV activities in places like the Manti LaSal National Forest.

In times like these, being merely mad is not enough. We must unite and fight back to stem the tide of these continuous losses. Understanding the urgency of the situation, the Utah Public Lands Alliance (UPLA) has taken a stand and selected the BlueRibbon Coalition to lead this crucial fight. BlueRibbon has been fighting for our access for over 30 years, and we now want to supercharge their ability to lead this fight.

Now, we’re reaching out to you, the backbone of the off-road community, not just for comments or letters, but for your financial support. We need funds to mount a legal battle against these closures, and we’re asking your organization to stand with us in this critical moment.

UPLA is spearheading a fundraising campaign to benefit BlueRibbon Coalition defense efforts. We are so committed to this effort to save our future, UPLA is matching the first $50,000 in donations dollar for dollar, meaning your donation’s value will be doubled. In addition, we are seeking other clubs, businesses, and organizations to join this effort to extend the match beyond the first $50,000

Together We Can Win, But We Can’t Do It Without You.

Your support is not just a donation; it’s an investment in the future of off-road adventures.

to save the trails we love, protect our rights to explore, and ensure that future generations can experience the thrill of off-road adventures.

Thank You!

Loren Campbell

president@utahpla.com




NHTSA Proposed Rule on Automated Emergency Braking Systems

We have another threat to OHV recreation, this time by the National Highway Transportation Safety Board in proposed rules that would affect many aspects of vehicles we use off highway. Learn more from this SEMA link on why you should oppose this rule. https://www.sema.org/…/sema-requests-feedback-impact…

AND THEN

 

Click Here to Submit your own Comments Opposing This Rule by August 14

UPLA submitted the following comments in opposition of this additional rule which will threaten OHV vehicles. Please click on the link above to learn more and

As an OHV enthusiast, I have serious concerns and reservations about NHTSA’s proposed rule regarding automated emergency braking systems (AEBS) for off-highway vehicles (OHVs). While safety is undoubtedly crucial, I believe this proposed rule could have several negative implications for the OHV community:

-Overreliance on technology: Implementing AEBS in OHVs might lead to riders becoming overly dependent on this technology. Off-roading requires skill, situational awareness, and quick decision-making, and relying too heavily on automated systems could erode these essential skills, potentially leading to complacency and increased accidents.
-Off-road terrain complexity: AEBS systems are primarily designed for use on paved roads, where conditions are more predictable. Off-road terrains can be highly diverse and unpredictable, featuring obstacles, mud, rocks, and varying slopes. The proposed rule does not take into account the complexities of off-road environments, which may render the AEBS less effective or even cause false alarms, disrupting the driving experience.
-Maintenance and reliability: OHVs are often exposed to rough and demanding environments, which could affect the reliability and performance of complex AEBS systems. If these systems become prone to malfunctions or require constant maintenance, it could be a significant burden for OHV owners and potentially compromise their safety.
-Personal responsibility: Off-roading is inherently an activity that involves an element of risk, and OHV enthusiasts understand and accept this fact. While safety measures are essential, they should not overshadow the responsibility of individual riders to drive cautiously and make informed decisions while navigating challenging terrains.
-Cost burden on consumers: Implementing AEBS systems in OHVs may result in increased manufacturing costs, which will ultimately be passed down to consumers. This could make OHVs less accessible to enthusiasts who rely on more affordable options to enjoy their passion for off-roading.
-Impact on aftermarket modifications: Many OHV owners customize their vehicles with aftermarket parts and modifications to suit their specific needs and preferences. The introduction of mandated AEBS systems might limit the scope for such modifications and reduce the freedom and creativity that enthusiasts enjoy.
-Training and awareness: Instead of focusing solely on mandating AEBS, the NHTSA should consider investing in education, training, and awareness campaigns to promote safe off-roading practices. Providing resources to enhance driving skills and responsible OHV use can be more effective in improving overall safety.
In conclusion, while safety is of paramount importance, the NHTSA’s proposed rule for AEBS in off-highway vehicles appears to be ill-suited for the unique challenges and characteristics of off-road environments. Instead, a more balanced approach that combines improved education, training, and voluntary safety measures could better serve the OHV community without compromising the essence of off-roading.As an OHV enthusiast, I have serious concerns and reservations about NHTSA’s proposed rule regarding automated emergency braking systems (AEBS) for off-highway vehicles (OHVs). While safety is undoubtedly crucial, I believe this proposed rule could have several negative implications for the OHV community:




Learn Why the Proposed BLM Rule Will Devastate Access